🔗 Share this article

When I am a Dungeon Master, I traditionally steered clear of significant use of chance during my Dungeons & Dragons sessions. I preferred was for the plot and session development to be shaped by player choice instead of the roll of a die. That said, I chose to try something different, and I'm incredibly pleased with the outcome.

The Spark: Seeing an Improvised Tool

A well-known streamed game utilizes a DM who regularly asks for "luck rolls" from the adventurers. The process entails choosing a type of die and defining potential outcomes tied to the result. While it's essentially no different from rolling on a random table, these are devised in the moment when a player's action doesn't have a predetermined outcome.

I opted to test this technique at my own table, primarily because it looked interesting and offered a departure from my usual habits. The outcome were fantastic, prompting me to reconsider the perennial tension between planning and randomization in a roleplaying game.

An Emotional Story Beat

In a recent session, my party had concluded a large-scale battle. When the dust settled, a player wondered if two friendly NPCs—a sibling duo—had survived. In place of deciding myself, I handed it over to chance. I instructed the player to make a twenty-sided die roll. The stakes were: on a 1-4, both died; on a 5-9, only one would die; a high roll, they survived.

The player rolled a 4. This resulted in a profoundly moving sequence where the party found the bodies of their allies, still holding hands in their final moments. The group performed a ceremony, which was especially meaningful due to prior character interactions. As a final touch, I chose that the remains were suddenly restored, containing a spell-storing object. By chance, the item's magical effect was precisely what the party required to solve another major quest obstacle. One just plan such perfect story beats.

Honing On-the-Spot Skills

This incident made me wonder if chance and spontaneity are in fact the core of this game. Even if you are a prep-heavy DM, your ability to adapt need exercise. Adventurers reliably excel at upending the most detailed plots. Therefore, a effective DM has to be able to think quickly and invent scenarios on the fly.

Employing similar mechanics is a fantastic way to train these skills without straying too much outside your preparation. The key is to use them for minor situations that have a limited impact on the overarching story. For instance, I wouldn't use it to determine if the king's advisor is a traitor. But, I could use it to decide whether the characters enter a room moments before a key action takes place.

Empowering Shared Narrative

Spontaneous randomization also helps maintain tension and cultivate the impression that the game world is alive, evolving according to their actions immediately. It combats the feeling that they are merely characters in a DM's sole narrative, thereby strengthening the collaborative nature of roleplaying.

This philosophy has long been embedded in the game's DNA. Early editions were enamored with encounter generators, which made sense for a playstyle focused on exploration. Although contemporary D&D tends to emphasizes narrative and role-play, leading many DMs to feel they need exhaustive notes, this isn't always the only path.

Achieving the Sweet Spot

There is absolutely no problem with thorough preparation. Yet, it's also fine no problem with letting go and allowing the rolls to determine certain outcomes in place of you. Direction is a big aspect of a DM's responsibilities. We need it to run the game, yet we often struggle to release it, even when doing so can lead to great moments.

A piece of suggestion is this: Don't be afraid of letting go of your plan. Experiment with a little improvisation for minor outcomes. The result could create that the organic story beat is far more memorable than anything you might have planned in advance.