🔗 Share this article

The count of guaranteed positions for Māori representatives on NZ councils is set to be slashed by more than half, after a divisive legislative amendment that required municipal councils to submit the future of hard-won Māori seats to a popular referendum.

Historical Context on Indigenous Representation

Indigenous electoral districts, which can include multiple elected officials based on demographic data, were established in 2001 to provide Māori electors the option to vote for a assured Indigenous council member in local and regional authorities. Originally, local governments could only create a Māori ward by first submitting it to a community referendum in their area. Communities often spent years building community backing and urging their councils to establish Māori wards.

Legislative Shifts and Administrative Decisions

To address this concern, the previous Labour government allowed local councils to set up a Māori ward without first requiring them to subject it to a popular ballot.

But in 2024, the right-wing coalition government overturned the policy, saying local residents should decide whether to establish Indigenous representation.

Referendum Results

The coalition’s law change required local authorities that had established a ward under Labour’s rules to conduct binding referendums alongside the local body elections, which ended on 11 October. Of 42 councils taking part in the public vote, 17 voted to retain their wards, and twenty-five to disestablish theirs – revealing numerous areas against guaranteed Māori representation.

These outcomes provided “a vital step in restoring local democratic control.”

Opposition parties nevertheless have condemned the government’s law change as “discriminatory” and “against Indigenous interests”. After assuming power, the current administration has implemented extensive reversals to measures intended to enhance Indigenous welfare and political inclusion. Officials has said it wants to end “race-based” approaches, and says it is dedicated to improving outcomes for Māori and every citizen.

Urban-Rural Divide

Outcomes of the public votes were divided down city-country divisions – most urban centers required to vote supported Māori wards, while rural regions leaned strongly towards disestablishing them.

“It's unfortunate for the Indigenous seats that had only just come in – they’re only just starting to find their footing.”

Electoral Participation and Concerns

This year’s local government elections registered the lowest voter turnout in 36 years, with under one-third of eligible voters casting a vote, prompting calls for an overhaul.

This approach had been “a mockery”.

Comparative Treatment

Local governments are permitted to establish different electoral districts – such as rural wards – without initially mandating a community ballot. The different conditions placed on Indigenous representation suggested the administration was singling out Māori representation.

“Well, they failed. Many communities have expressed strong opposition.”

This statement referred to the 17 regions that voted to retain their wards.